![]() I'd say that Biosphere3D has what it takes to become a Google EarthĬompetitor, given that a few more people work on it. The focus is vegetation rendering, not replacing Google Earth. Right now, only a single person (myself) is working on Biosphere3D, and You can have a look at some screenshots at Lacking someone with proper experience in this field. Libraries and most of the code is already posix compatible, but we're It's available for Windows (32 and 64 bit). There's already basic support for GIS data (shape file overlay). Up to 2TB uncompressed (27GB compressed). It handles large satellite images and digital elevation models, tested Our research has been published on the EuroVis and the SimVis It sports a state-of-the-art terrain management and rendering system. It is based exclusively on open source libraries. Up to now, no externalĬontributions have been made, so this is negotiable. It is already open source under the MPL. ![]() That handles planet sized terrains, called Biosphere3D: We currently develop a landscape visualization system ![]() I just saw on your high priority list that you're looking for a GoogleĮarth replacement. Cons: Poor 3D capabilites, poor interface, poor WMS support, no WFS support, poor terrain visualization, poor navigation, poor scalability.Pros: GPL, education oriented, lightwieght, snappy for simple geographic data.I'mĪctually surprised that the editor of your high priority list wasn't Should fulfill your need for a free Google Earth replacement.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |